Martin Falk
Martin Falk
yes, and exactly here it is sensible to have "proper" values. Think of linking to isosurface render processors for different volumes but the same isovalue.
Right now, I need a calculator for that... besides the fact that I see 9.8 in the TF editor and have to convert it from [3.5, 914.1] to [0, 1]...
I am pretty much in favor of the status bar solutions for some quick feedback. Detailed profiling by @petersteneteg would complement this and is welcome as well :-)
@petersteneteg I think the reason for the overuse is that people tend to look at existing processors, like the background processor, and see it implemented like that. One problem copying...
Neither `utilgl::activateTargetAndCopySource()` nor `ImageGL::copyRepresentationsTo()` (used by copy source) check the blend state. https://github.com/inviwo/inviwo/blob/5728b3368984bd19446d8c74f9981c0e9442f606/modules/opengl/src/image/imagegl.cpp#L118
In case the output argument `-o` is supplied to the regression script and the folder does not exist, the script fails as well (DataBase error).
I agree, those are all nice to have features. Some thoughts: - where do you want to edit the labels? - invert the selection/filtering for a single axis or all...
Thanks. We will look into it.
Duplicate of #251
Using the `` key to close the dialog also avoids this problem from happening.