SelfBlendedImages icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
SelfBlendedImages copied to clipboard

FF++ c23 c40 result

Open LOOKCC opened this issue 3 years ago • 5 comments

In paper 4.4. Cross-Manipulation Evaluation,“We use the raw version for evaluation as well as the competitors.” but the most of the CVPR2021 and ICCV21 papers all use the c23 as the FF++ result to compare. But there is no c23 and c40 results in your paper. And as we know, the raw result in ff++ is neally 100% auc which is meanless to compare the raw.

what's more, comparing with FTCN and LipForensics, "Robustness to unseen perturbations" part is lost in paper, So I want to konw the Robustness of Self-Blended.

LOOKCC avatar Jun 07 '22 15:06 LOOKCC

Have you ever run the code on C40 and get any results?

M-SunRise avatar Aug 29 '22 00:08 M-SunRise

Have you ever run the code on C40 and get any results?

I did some experiments on c23 and the results were not very satisfying to me.

LOOKCC avatar Aug 29 '22 06:08 LOOKCC

Thanks for your generous sharing.

M-SunRise avatar Aug 29 '22 07:08 M-SunRise

@LOOKCC would you tell me how to test FF++ dataset ? should we revise the code in inference._dataset.py !?

YU-SHAO-XU avatar Sep 08 '22 08:09 YU-SHAO-XU

I conducted experiments on c40, and the generalization to other datasets yielded good results. However, the performance was quite poor in the cross-manipulation evaluation on FF++. The AUC results were approximately NT-60.67, DF-66.72, F2F-64.54, and FS-56.19.

Blosslzy avatar Jul 24 '23 04:07 Blosslzy