Simon Lundmark
Simon Lundmark
Hi, sorry for the late answer. Yes it is possible but unlikely that it's from a different typelib. Maybe it's possible to track down the other fix that I copied...
Sure thing!
Did you fix it? I still kept this one as a feature :)
This is a suggestion of what it could look like: ` "MyFlags" : { "values" : [ { "name" : "MY_FLAGS_NONE", "value" : 0 }, { "name" : "MY_FLAGS_SOME", "bits"...
#126 is not enough, but it's a very good part of the way! binary format is useable, but not as useable as the bitshift-thing.
Sorry that is a good point. The idea is of course to be able to do things such as: D = ~B or other bitfield manipulations with them.
Right so the issue is mainly when declaring the types not when reading actual data. You want to be able to configure bits to exact bitfields. You want to be...
Hmmm, it would probably break a bit. I'm not sure how much you want to re-do it or what you want to re-do it to. But I don't think that...
To be honest, thinking about this for a while - I would be fine without the functions tbh. But you can also require that the user optionally can define their...
Is this really wanted? multi-dimensional arrays are generally pretty hard to use tbh. I think it's better if people just use: uint32[x*y]; and then just index with i*x+j when iterating?