David J Patrick
David J Patrick
the only non-simple part I can think of, is if you had a task "running" then clicked on other thing(s) (for durations < 5sec) and then clicked back on the...
if implemented, this should be optional, as I don't want/ need it
Let me revise that, on thinking about it, I _would_ like per-second resolution and the _option_ to display seconds, thanks :-)
Closed in favour of #1220 https://github.com/simonmichael/hledger/issues/1220#issuecomment-968392952
I'm confused. "timedot supports descriptions".. how? I get an error putting anything after the date. I often put a comment like `;Friday` on the line following the date, but.. Does...
Oh that's cool on the date (emacsism?) but I'm after a description on the entry ``` (fos.hledger) 2.25 more dumb suggestions in irc ```
yes, it's (nearly) perfect! Ruminate, maybe there IS room for that description :-D
timedot entries being a one-liner, with an inherited date, is my favorite part of it, but it only has a date, an account and an amount, no description (or comment...
After some thought.. (5 years!?) maybe it would be _even better_ to integrate timewarrior, as an enhancement to taskwhisperer, rather than a companion sort of thing. Y'know, for some future...
also very interested! +1