Runtime error in extract_mrcn_det_feats.py
It gives a runtime error when I run the command
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=gpu_id python tools/extract_mrcn_det_feats.py --dataset refcoco --splitBy unc.
***` RuntimeError: Dimension out of range (expected to be in range of [-2, 1], but got 3)
Error corresponds to line #59 fc7 = fc7.mean(3).mean(2)
When I debug the code, in line 58, fc7 is a tensor with the dimensions of [1,2048].
@lichengunc I kindly request your help with this issue. I am not sure whether I am doing anything wrong here.
It gives a runtime error when I run the command
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=gpu_id python tools/extract_mrcn_det_feats.py --dataset refcoco --splitBy unc. ***` RuntimeError: Dimension out of range (expected to be in range of [-2, 1], but got 3)Error corresponds to line #59 fc7 = fc7.mean(3).mean(2)
When I debug the code, in line 58, fc7 is a tensor with the dimensions of [1,2048].
@lichengunc I kindly request your help with this issue. I am not sure whether I am doing anything wrong here.
Have you solved that?
It gives a runtime error when I run the command
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=gpu_id python tools/extract_mrcn_det_feats.py --dataset refcoco --splitBy unc. ***` RuntimeError: Dimension out of range (expected to be in range of [-2, 1], but got 3) Error corresponds to line #59 fc7 = fc7.mean(3).mean(2) When I debug the code, in line 58, fc7 is a tensor with the dimensions of [1,2048]. @lichengunc I kindly request your help with this issue. I am not sure whether I am doing anything wrong here.Have you solved that?
I removed that line and the code worked fine. But not sure whether it alters any intentions of the author.
It gives a runtime error when I run the command
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=gpu_id python tools/extract_mrcn_det_feats.py --dataset refcoco --splitBy unc. ***` RuntimeError: Dimension out of range (expected to be in range of [-2, 1], but got 3) Error corresponds to line #59 fc7 = fc7.mean(3).mean(2) When I debug the code, in line 58, fc7 is a tensor with the dimensions of [1,2048]. @lichengunc I kindly request your help with this issue. I am not sure whether I am doing anything wrong here.Have you solved that?
I removed that line and the code worked fine. But not sure whether it alters any intentions of the author.
thanks . I then run the evaluate 1 and get the same results. (Maybe the author wants us to know clearly)