TimeMixer icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
TimeMixer copied to clipboard

Detailed Performance Comparison and Version Differences

Open kokeblom opened this issue 9 months ago • 1 comments

Hi Team,

I've been exploring the TimeMixer repository and its impressive capabilities. However, I noticed that while the main results and benchmarks are well-documented, there's limited detail on:

  1. Performance comparison between TimeMixer and TimeMixer++ across specific tasks (e.g., long-term vs. short-term forecasting).
  2. Key differences in implementation or architecture between the two versions.

Could you provide a breakdown of these aspects? This would greatly help in understanding the improvements and deciding which version to use for specific use cases.

Thanks for your support!

kokeblom avatar Apr 12 '25 08:04 kokeblom

Thank you for your interest in our work! We appreciate your thoughtful questions. For the performance comparison between TimeMixer and TimeMixer++, you can refer to the details presented in our paper. As for further documentation on implementation or architecture differences, we are currently addressing several issues, so this might take some time. We truly appreciate your support and patience.

kevinliu2000 avatar Apr 15 '25 18:04 kevinliu2000