API incompatible with BouncyCastle in FIPS mode
Describe the bug API incompatible with BouncyCastle in FIPS mode
Client Version all versions >= 7.0.0
Kubernetes Version
1.19.2
Java Version Java 11
To Reproduce Modify JDK11 conf/security/java.security file to use the BC FIPS provider as follows:
security.provider.1=org.bouncycastle.jcajce.provider.BouncyCastleFipsProvider C:DEFRND[CTRAES256];ENABLE{ALL};
security.provider.2=sun.security.provider.Sun
security.provider.3=sun.security.rsa.SunRsaSign
security.provider.4=com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Provider BCFIPS
security.provider.5=com.sun.crypto.provider.SunJCE
security.provider.6=apple.security.AppleProvider
pom.xml:
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/maven-v4_0_0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>com.test.java</groupId>
<artifactId>java-app</artifactId>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>
<name>java-app</name>
<url>http://maven.apache.org</url>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>io.kubernetes</groupId>
<artifactId>client-java</artifactId>
<version>7.0.0</version> <!-- version 6.0.1 works fine -->
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</project>
Java test class:
package com.test.java;
import io.kubernetes.client.openapi.ApiClient;
import io.kubernetes.client.openapi.Configuration;
import io.kubernetes.client.openapi.apis.CoreV1Api;
import io.kubernetes.client.openapi.models.V1Pod;
import io.kubernetes.client.openapi.models.V1PodList;
import io.kubernetes.client.util.Config;
public class KubeTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
ApiClient client = Config.defaultClient();
Configuration.setDefaultApiClient(client);
CoreV1Api api = new CoreV1Api();
V1PodList list = api.listPodForAllNamespaces(null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null, null/*, null*/);
for (V1Pod item : list.getItems()) {
System.out.println(item.getMetadata().getName());
}
}
}
Program Output:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/bouncycastle/crypto/CipherParameters
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:1017)
at java.base/java.security.SecureClassLoader.defineClass(SecureClassLoader.java:174)
at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.defineClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:800)
at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.findClassOnClassPathOrNull(BuiltinClassLoader.java:698)
at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClassOrNull(BuiltinClassLoader.java:621)
at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.BuiltinClassLoader.loadClass(BuiltinClassLoader.java:579)
at java.base/jdk.internal.loader.ClassLoaders$AppClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoaders.java:178)
at java.base/java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:522)
at org.bouncycastle.jcajce.provider.asymmetric.DSA$Mappings.configure(Unknown Source)
at org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider.loadAlgorithms(Unknown Source)
at org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider.setup(Unknown Source)
at org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider.access$000(Unknown Source)
at org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider$1.run(Unknown Source)
at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at org.bouncycastle.jce.provider.BouncyCastleProvider.<init>(Unknown Source)
at io.kubernetes.client.util.SSLUtils.<clinit>(SSLUtils.java:52)
at io.kubernetes.client.util.credentials.ClientCertificateAuthentication.provide(ClientCertificateAuthentication.java:37)
at io.kubernetes.client.util.credentials.KubeconfigAuthentication.provide(KubeconfigAuthentication.java:39)
at io.kubernetes.client.util.ClientBuilder.build(ClientBuilder.java:307)
at io.kubernetes.client.util.Config.defaultClient(Config.java:113)
at com.journaldev.java.KubeTest.main(KubeTest.java:12)```
**Expected behavior**
The program lists the pods in all namespaces
**KubeConfig**
If applicable, add a KubeConfig file with secrets redacted.
**Server (please complete the following information):**
- OS: MacOS
- Environment: Running directly on the host
- Cloud: None
**Additional context**
The same program with minor modifications for the kubernetes imports and the listPodForAllNamespaces works as expected when using kubernetes client version 6.0.1.
What version of BouncyCastle are you using? This looks like a problem in BouncyCastle itself, I suspect that the FIPS version is different than the standard one that we use.
What version of BouncyCastle are you using? This looks like a problem in BouncyCastle itself, I suspect that the FIPS version is different than the standard one that we use.
We have a requirement to use the FIPS version of BouncyCastle. We are currently using bcfips-1.0.2. This is configured in the java.security file as a security provider and causes some dependency issues. It would help to be able to use the FIPS version if configured in the classpath similar to how https://github.com/puppetlabs/jvm-ssl-utils/blob/main/src/java/com/puppetlabs/ssl_utils/SSLUtils.java is doing it. Is this something that can be considered?
My company also requires BouncyCastle FIPs (as do most companies now). Java Client 14.0.0 is incompatible with it. Please upgrade to BouncyCastle FIPs 1.0.2, its not a major change. It's a drop in replacement.
@brendandburns Any update on this issue? The "standard" BouncyCastle (bcprov) is considered insecure and not allowed at most companies. You should be using bc-fips and bcpkix-fips. They are mostly drop in replacements. A few minor namespace differences and a few classes were renamed to xxxFips, etc.
This issue makes the library unusable in most modern Java apps.
I also need this update as part of fips migration, can I do it myself? the new version will also fix https://github.com/kubernetes-client/java/issues/2168
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle stale - Mark this issue or PR as rotten with
/lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale
I also need this update as part of fips migration, can I do it myself? the new version will also fix #2168
yup. go for it.
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Close this issue or PR with
/close - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied - After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closed
You can:
- Reopen this issue or PR with
/reopen - Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten - Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
@k8s-triage-robot: Closing this issue.
In response to this:
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs.
This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
- After 90d of inactivity,
lifecycle/staleis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/stalewas applied,lifecycle/rottenis applied- After 30d of inactivity since
lifecycle/rottenwas applied, the issue is closedYou can:
- Reopen this issue or PR with
/reopen- Mark this issue or PR as fresh with
/remove-lifecycle rotten- Offer to help out with Issue Triage
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.
Does anyone know if this was resolved via another ticket, or is the library still not compatible with Bouncy Castle in FIPS mode?