kaiserd
kaiserd
Thank you for the feedback :).
@Menduist and I came to the conclusion (Discord) that removing the random delay in the fluff phase from the current version would be better. 1b82a8f4 adds this revision. @staheri14 @jm-clius...
Awesome :). Thanks :).
For the time being, we could use the #network-privacy channel on the Vac discord. I'll send you invites :).
@corpetty What would we need to publish this as a raw RFC? Is there anything to add / overhaul contentwise, apart from the few unaddressed comments? Also, it might make...
LGTM :+1: I agree with pushing in the current state and addressing the rest in future PRs.
@corpetty The CI has been fixed. After removing the files @oskarth listed above and signing all commits, this PR should be mergable :).
I rewrote the history to sign unsigned commits: * remove merged-in commits form master (otherwise, we cannot cleanly rebase on master at the end) * sigend all commits in this...
> should spec adherence to the RFC template (very important IMO) be a pre-condition for moving to stable, or would a stable wire protocol be enough? Imo, following the template...
Hi :). Has there been any progress on this? I would be particularly interested in the current state of privacy / anonymity analysis work with respect to gossipsub. I am...