judovana
Injection of second agent replaces/removes the first one
a) a "new" second JRD process does not see the modifications of a previous first JRD process b) if the second JRD is unloaded, first JRD cannot read the bytecode, until it injects the agent
Is b) really true? That once again shakes up how I understood the transformation agent pipeline :/
Would love to have some reproducible steps to also witness these observations.
start jd gui, make some changes in itself, run cli and modify the gui.. what will happen?
note - if you run two guis, then you can easily end in false negativum, by removing one agent, by secteing second vm
-- Mgr. Jiri Vanek @.***
---------- Původní e-mail ---------- Od: Prokop Tunel @.> Komu: pmikova/java-runtime-decompiler @. github.com> Datum: 22. 10. 2021 15:51:09 Předmět: Re: [pmikova/java-runtime-decompiler] Injection of second agent replaces/removes the first one (#183) "
Would love to have some reproducible steps to also witness these observations.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub (https://github.com/pmikova/java-runtime-decompiler/issues/183#issuecomment-949650954) , or unsubscribe (https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAWFCS5JNHLA3D3INPIS5BDUIFT4JANCNFSM5FYR7Z7Q) . Triage notifications on the go with GitHub Mobile for iOS (https://apps.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1477376905?ct=notification-email&mt=8&pt=524675) or Android (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.github.android&referrer=utm_campaign%3Dnotification-email%26utm_medium%3Demail%26utm_source%3Dgithub) . "