Judith Eckle-Kohler

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `richard.eckart` on 2014-08-04 10:13:40

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-10-30 14:22:38 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.7.0

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `chmeyer.de` on 2015-04-10 08:57:50 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.8.0 - **Labels removed**: Milestone-0.7.0

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-11-07 09:30:03 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.7.0 - **Labels removed**: Milestone-0.6.0

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `chmeyer.de` on 2015-04-10 08:57:50 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.8.0 - **Labels removed**: Milestone-0.7.0

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-10-09 17:25:58 - **Labels added**: Type-Enhancement - **Labels removed**: Type-Defect

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-10-30 16:21:34 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.7.0 - **Labels removed**: Milestone-0.6.0

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `chmeyer.de` on 2015-04-10 08:57:50 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.8.0 - **Labels removed**: Milestone-0.7.0

``` I would keep the redundancy because 1) it is created automatically (and thus consistently) - Uby is read-only 2) applications might depend on one of the 3 variants 3)...

``` (No text was entered with this change) ``` Original issue reported on code.google.com by `eckle.kohler` on 2014-10-30 14:22:51 - **Labels added**: Milestone-0.7.0