Jos de Jong
Jos de Jong
Yes, I would love to have numerical implementations to do integration, differentiation, etc 👍 . Thanks for bringing this up. Related: #227
Sounds good, thanks for your offer @jjram20 👍 . Before you work out new functions in detail, please keep us up to date on what exactly you plan to implement...
Yes it makes sense to introduce a new category, "numerical" or "calculus" (what would be the best name?), and create a folder in `/src/function`. What functions do you exactly have...
That sounds like a good and realistic plan (not too much at once). Do you have any preference for the name of the category? Ie. "numerical" or "calculus" or something...
Yes I like that best too 👍
Indeed, this is unfortunately not possible: it conflicts with implicit multiplication.
Indeed. If you have these curried functions it may be easier to create a helper function around `f` and `g` which allows you to pass both `x` and `y` at...
That is an interesting idea, that would definitely work. I'm not sure if the need for it is high enough right now to justify implementing it. Current solution is to...
1. That is a good point. I think it wouldn't do harm to allow that, except that it feels inconsistent if `EXPR(A)` would be handled differently than `EXPR(A, B)`. 2....
(1) 😂 good point. Yes, I'm OK with changing the behavior of `EXPR(A, B)` to execute this as a function (2.a) yes, sorry for the confusion, I've fixed the example...