jclaggett
Is seqex still relevant?
@jclaggett @Chouser I really enjoyed your talk at ClojureConj 2013!
But I have a question: now that we have clojure.spec, do we still need seqex?
The only thing I don't see in clojure.spec is syndoc. But maybe there is more.
cc: @trptcolin @rahulkavale
Hello Yehonathan,
I would say that clojure.spec is a good replacement for seqex. One simple reason is that clojure.spec is part of Clojure directly and not a library. Another reason is that I've not been able to actively work on seqex in some time.
Regards and good luck coding, Jonathan
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Yehonathan Sharvit < [email protected]> wrote:
I really enjoyed your talk at ClojureConj 2013!
But I have a question: now that we have clojure.spec, do we still need seqex?
The only thing I don't see in clojure.spec is syndoc. But maybe there is more.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jclaggett/seqex/issues/9, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGKLZf7BguVo616Lzf4P_8vcJxACaCWks5q4C4QgaJpZM4Kh8RD .
Makes sense. Thx
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016, 23:44 Jonathan Claggett [email protected] wrote:
Hello Yehonathan,
I would say that clojure.spec is a good replacement for seqex. One simple reason is that clojure.spec is part of Clojure directly and not a library. Another reason is that I've not been able to actively work on seqex in some time.
Regards and good luck coding, Jonathan
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:52 AM, Yehonathan Sharvit < [email protected]> wrote:
I really enjoyed your talk at ClojureConj 2013!
But I have a question: now that we have clojure.spec, do we still need seqex?
The only thing I don't see in clojure.spec is syndoc. But maybe there is more.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jclaggett/seqex/issues/9, or mute the thread < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGKLZf7BguVo616Lzf4P_8vcJxACaCWks5q4C4QgaJpZM4Kh8RD
.
— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/jclaggett/seqex/issues/9#issuecomment-261379141, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA6VPlpoLxbjy0wVUhAdqZ56q6qHjfIcks5q_MqggaJpZM4Kh8RD .