[SYCL] Add more aspect information for intel_gpu_* in device config file

[jzc]

[asudarsa]

Hi,

Any comments about the failing tests?

Thanks

[AlexeySachkov]

LGTM. Is this supported by any existing tests? Will we benefit for adding tests here? I am ok with adding test in a subsequent PR.

There is a couple of tests: test-e2e/AOT/reqd-sg-size.cpp, test-e2e/AOT/double.cpp that perform E2E testing of the feature.

We won't be able to test every config line, simply because we don't have all that HW in our CI pool. However, we should add a test (I propose as a follow-up PR) to ensure consistency between targets listed in the config file, targets available through -fsycl-targets option and targets known to device_architecture extension - all three should "know" the same list of targets.