Giacomo Barbieri

Hi @krzkaczor thank you for the prompt response. We currently support all the Etherscan endpoints, so it should be pretty easy. Let me know if you need other input from...

@krzkaczor specifically this ones: https://routescan.io/documentation/etherscan-compatibility/contracts We already support Snowtrace: https://snowtrace.deth.net/address/0x6e84a6216eA6dACC71eE8E6b0a5B7322EEbC0fDd But you'd need to enable support from your side for the other chains as well. We aim to support 100...

@krzkaczor any feedback here?

Hey there -- we already built it, but are looking for support to index some chains. We call it the **Superscan**: https://superscan.network It's an Etherscan-equivalent multi-chain integrated block explorer. We...

@smartcontracts is there a specific reason why this is not an RFP?

We're interested in building this as a section of https://thesuperscan.io

@lucemans I believe ENSIP-9 doesn’t actually solve the issue, but gives redundancy in case this only gets applied to the stricter Ethereum ecosystem. The whole reason to do this multi-chain...

> Please clarify that in the section "Solution Impact" a validator with the minimum stake is considered. Add the missing info man :-))) > > Solution Impact > > At...

> All formatting nits except for one more substantive question: > > Validator profits from delegations I believe depend primarily on the demand for delegators at a given delegation fee...

Thank you @gc-gc-30 for your comments > Of those that remain, the economic breakdown you highlight neglects to include node operational expenses, for which a vps at recommended specs is...