hypertrons
[Refactor] Beautify the OSS-GPT interface style
Description
At present, there are plans to beautify the interface of OSS-GPT, and the following specific beautification proposals are proposed. We also welcome your comments.
-
The font size of the page at the beginning of GPT is different from that of the page after GPT. Just entered the page found that the font is a little large, and then the font becomes smaller.
-
Make the distinction of the bubble box more obvious, such as the color of the bubble box is gray for the question, and the color of the answer is black.
-
The Q&A interface feels that the questioner's profile picture can be removed. Because the profile picture is a little slow to load, there is no questioner profile picture, can make the page more information?
-
Change the background color of the answer output code to the same color as the page.
-
The OSS-GPT on the top can be made smaller because there are too many black edges to show more information.
-
Can the background be made transparent? You can let some light in, blur the background, but it may not be as beautiful as it is now, so try it first.
-
This return to the bottom button is a little simple, or put a button directly, a downward icon appears more intuitive.
-
Put both model switching and clearing the current session on OSS-GPT.
-
When there are words in the input field, make a small animation and turn this arrow up.
-
Make the OSS-GPT interface more flexible, freely drag, zoom in and out on the page.
Previously, I uploaded a demo without detailed design for both font and page styles. My suggestion is that you first take a look at the current implementation code and the components used. Tracing back to the open-source components used, the functionality and callbacks of some components, and the difficulty level of your redevelopment. Draw an understanding and judgment.
My suggestion is that you first take a look at the current implementation code and the components used. Tracing back to the open-source components used, the functionality and callbacks of some components, and the difficulty level of your redevelopment. Draw an understanding and judgment.
Thanks for the heads-up. Okay, I'll check it out.