[WIP] feat: VC DI proof request
Quality Gate passed
Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication
I know this is still WIP, but we need to have a description on the PR (is necessary in case anyone needs to look back on this PR in the future, and is also used for release notes). Also it's good - if the PR is in WIP state - to make a note of what is done and what's still outstanding ...
Also just noticed the commit is missing the DCO signoff
There is quite a few things reported in sonarcloud. I don't think everything needs to be addressed but some definitely should like the unused variable and shadow variable names.
https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=hyperledger_aries-cloudagent-python&pullRequest=2960&resolved=false&sinceLeakPeriod=true
Maybe have a go over and see if we can make some improvements. I think overall the code looks good and well tested.
There is quite a few things reported in sonarcloud. I don't think everything needs to be addressed but some definitely should like the unused variable and shadow variable names.
https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=hyperledger_aries-cloudagent-python&pullRequest=2960&resolved=false&sinceLeakPeriod=true
Maybe have a go over and see if we can make some improvements. I think overall the code looks good and well tested.
Good catch @jamshale
@EmadAnwer can you review the SonarCloud report and do a bit of cleanup? As Jamie says we don't need to address everything but take a pass and see what you think.
There is quite a few things reported in sonarcloud. I don't think everything needs to be addressed but some definitely should like the unused variable and shadow variable names. https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=hyperledger_aries-cloudagent-python&pullRequest=2960&resolved=false&sinceLeakPeriod=true Maybe have a go over and see if we can make some improvements. I think overall the code looks good and well tested.
Good catch @jamshale
@EmadAnwer can you review the SonarCloud report and do a bit of cleanup? As Jamie says we don't need to address everything but take a pass and see what you think.
yes sure
Quality Gate passed
Issues
12 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
86.4% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
Quality Gate passed
Issues
12 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
86.4% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code
There is quite a few things reported in sonarcloud. I don't think everything needs to be addressed but some definitely should like the unused variable and shadow variable names. https://sonarcloud.io/project/issues?id=hyperledger_aries-cloudagent-python&pullRequest=2960&resolved=false&sinceLeakPeriod=true Maybe have a go over and see if we can make some improvements. I think overall the code looks good and well tested.
Good catch @jamshale @EmadAnwer can you review the SonarCloud report and do a bit of cleanup? As Jamie says we don't need to address everything but take a pass and see what you think.
yes sure
@jamshale @ianco I have fixed most of it, check it please, let me know if there are any suggestions
I'm going to merge this. Would be nice to have in the 1.0.0 release and don't predict any regressions.
w00t!!! Awesome.