Fix #1071
The simplest change, and still a good improvement over the status-quo,
it just requiring a member initializer,
suggesting = () as one typically does to comply with @basic_value.
Hi! Just checking in as I clean up the PRs with the relicensing (see #1322), is still intended to be still a draft PR? If so perhaps I'll close it for now and you can reopen this or a new PR once it's ready to look at?
As described in #1322, this didn't make release 0.8, so I will need a new one-time CLA that will cover all your future contributions. I've emailed you the new CLA, and one it's completed I can look at PRs.
Hi! This PR is in standby on my side, until I can get my day job to stop invading my weekends 😅
I've emailed you the new CLA, and one it's completed I can look at PRs.
I think I missed your email @hsutter, and I can't seem to find it
If so perhaps I'll close it for now and you can reopen this or a new PR once it's ready to look at?
No problem to close the PR if you wish to