Change an assert to match code, hopefully.
Ran into this assert. The entire destructuring of For names things has to go, but the code only accesses two elements here and I'm not sure why a two level loop next shouldn't be applicable here.
This PR has been sitting here for a while -- should it land?
Andrew and I agreed that the entire thing being checked here is probably no longer needed. Planning to test that hypothesis and do it on this PR if it works.
Any update on this PR?
Ping for status.
I'm testing the hypothesis that the thing being checked is no longer needed. Will report back shortly.
Replaced by #7386