Sam Yates

I've made a branch (https://github.com/halfflat/charm/tree/shasta-on-6.10.2) which pulls in the #3032, #3497 and #3499 PRs onto v6.10.2, resolving conflicts and removing, as much as I noticed, any 7.0.0-specific code. I've only...

Thanks for taking a look at it! The other thing I was hoping to add in a separate patch is an option to make `+ofi_runtime_tcp` on by default, so that...

It's important that we verify the functional behaviour of mechanisms included with the Arbor library, and ensure that changes to e.g. modcc do not change the dynamical behaviour of these...

Pybind11 makes it fairly easy to support copy and deepcopy: we just need to add the methods in the binding definition. Or we make the classes picklable, which is a...

Up to now, we'd been working on the assumption that this sort of editing could be performed outside of Arbor, using other tools, and one of the reasons for this...

I certainly like the idea of splitting out the SVE side; it's really incompatible with the rest of the API. Regarding `std::experimental::simd`: * We could still factor our SIMD library...

Could the use case be made a bit more explicit? I ask because spatial queries for morphologies are handled by `embed_pwlin` `place_pwlin`, which already includes the isometry of course. Translating...

The placement interface can provide the results of isometric transformations, but the interface acts on cables, not on regions, and I think we still don't have a Python interface for...

Hmm .. how does the duck quack test work? :) If it's testing something about the geometry, then it should either be examining the points in the segment tree —...

For this purpose, I'd suggest we should look at the possibility of segment-tree interfaces to the morphology loaders, and ensure that we make it straightforward to apply an isometry to...