Marco Hutter

I did actually try out JExtract 5 years ago: https://mail.openjdk.org/pipermail/panama-dev/2019-February/004443.html But beyond that, I have not been able to follow the developments of Panama recently (or rather: for quite a...

IIRC, there had been a _bit_ of hassle for "getting JExtract running" in the first place, but only due to the usual suspects (linux `/` vs. windows `\` path separators...

I'm lacking some context here, and don't even know what the target architecture of the Google pixel is. Is it correct that there has to be a native library that...

> Its android with mostly arm64-v8 arch That word "**mostly**" is one point raises the question for me here. The native library that is supposed to be loaded has to...

Sorry for the delay, and only a short 'acknowledge' for now: I'll try to allocate some time to look into this. But it does not seem to be super urgent...

Nobody provided it. I can not (easily or reasonably) build the binaries for all possible combinations of operating systems and architectures. You can compile the native library on your own,...

I don't know whether that makes any difference. I guess it's just OpenJDK? Maybe @blueberry can give a hint here.

> what version of the JDK should I build it against? Do you have a JDK installed right now (and not only a JRE)? (I think that CMake should be...

The version may be a relevant point here. Usually, in terms of compatibility, it's good to use "the lowest version that works". To be honest, I never thought about where...

The "x86_64" part is only part of the file name, used for disambiguating (the specific combination of Linux+Arm is not yet covered at https://github.com/gpu/JOCL/blob/fefa66d49dfefddde0f7f99ced4e3329e376cba8/CMakeLists.txt#L44 ) So it should be OK...