google
Fix confusing Javadoc of memoizeWithExpiration
The previous wording could be read such that the cache is cleared in the background once the expiration time is reached. However this is not the case, so we simply remove the following part of the Javadoc: "and removes the cached value after the specified time has passed" The rest of the Javadoc already accurately describes the behavior, though the part with "After the expiration time" could again be misinterpreted, so we rewrite this to clarify that things only happen once the "get" method is called.
It says I should request a rescan regarding CLA from a repository manager. I assume the person who does the releases is for sure one of the a repository managers, so that would be @cpovirk.
This is indeed a common cause of confusion.
It would still be good for the first sentence to say something about the expiration. Maybe use the original phrasing but with "removes" changed to "invalidates?" But even that may be misleading, given that Cache.invalidate uses that word for immediate removal (I think). Other ideas?
