fsprojects
Add 2 new rules NestedFunctionNames and UnnestedFunctionNames
These rules allow configuring naming conventions for nested and unnested function names.
LGTM, let's squash all commits into 1? (Use Co-authored-by: Name Surname <[email protected]> tag in commit message.)
From 064444fec757bf273cf6e0d856838dea3179a214 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: webwarrior <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 06:48:56 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add 2 new rules NestedFunctionNames and UnnestedFunctionNames
These rules allow configuring naming conventions for nested and unnested function names.
Co-authored-by: Retheesh Erathu <[email protected]>
It should be the other way around: Retheesh be the author of the commit (as the majority of the code is his), but add yourself in the Co-authored-by tag.
Why do I see 6 commits now in this PR instead of 1 or 2? Commit 31a1fba1cfd710b5c06a6105d66137314cb6cc6e looks correct and you should've used --amend to that one.
Why do I see 6 commits now in this PR instead of 1 or 2? Commit 31a1fba looks correct and you should've used --amend to that one.
For some reason my local function-names branch was unsynchronized with remote one. So I pulled and pushed.
That's the reason then. Please always use --rebase when pulling, otherwise it causes this kind of weird merges/messes.
@webwarrior-ws can you rebase this please (also pls update the "Introduced in" text in docs).
@webwarrior-ws can you rebase this please (also pls update the "Introduced in" text in docs).
ping