FSharp.UMX

FSharp.UMX copied to clipboard

Happypig375

Based on #28 and the desire to support UOM for `uint32` I've added UOM for all missing basic CLR types (except `nativeint` and `unativeint`).

Choc13

Please support uint32

1

Sometimes I see using `uint32` offers advantages over `uint32`-backed enums. https://github.com/fsprojects/FSharp.UMX/blob/master/src/FSharp.UMX.fs#L31 Not sure if there's any interest in uint16, int8

nodakai

Bumps [json5](https://github.com/json5/json5) from 2.1.0 to 2.2.3. Release notes Sourced from json5's releases. v2.2.3 Fix: [email protected] is now the 'latest' release according to npm instead of v1.0.2. (#299) v2.2.2 Fix: Properties...

dependabot[bot]

Using UMX in literal values

1

Is it possible to create a non-numeric UMX value explicitly, without going through `%`, so that it will be a valid constant expression? I need them to be a literal...

piaste

Converting to string and performing string operation

4

There's also a more general question about conversations, but should something like this be possible? Fails to build as well so it's not an Ionide quirk.

cartermp

Switch to PackageLicenseExpression

6

Gotta keep those scanners quiet

bartelink

What are the drawbacks of using this library over single case discriminated unions?

1

Hello, This library looks neat and I am very tempted to replace our use of single-case discriminated unions with unit of measures since we mostly use them to strongly type...

nkosi23

Hello I do not know if this is related to the compiler itself, but I post here just in case. I try to use a UOF based on string, if...

IkertxoDt