Frieder Erdmann

I'm trying to fit a huge amount of data into `tmpfs` (+512GB). Will it suffice to increase `sgx.enclave_size` approprietly or do I also have to increase the size of `loader.pal_internal_mem_size`?

If my understanding is correct, files written to tmpfs will be located in EPC memory. Via paging they might get encrypted and move to non EPC memory. And from there...

> but 512GB enclave is prooooobably not something you want to do Could you elaborate? Will I run into any hard coded limits? I will likely want to go even...

I've done a test run with a 256GB enclave on a server with 256GB EPC, filling tmpfs with 125GB of files, this has worked without issues. Startup time is noticable,...

Going back to the main topic of this issue. I think it would make sense to require a size definition for each tmpfs mount. [Linux does so as well](https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt) :...

@guzongmin thanks for your detailed answer. Do you mind keeping this issue open to keep track of reproducible builds for occlum?

@marmarek when I tested TGL system76 hardware with qubes 4.0 I was able to boot it via modification of the coreboot firmware. Checkout this patch: https://github.com/system76/coreboot/pull/42 What I was not...

@dimakuv Currently we haven't set any performance goals for this project. If there is a trivial implementation for shrinking, we can see how much this will affect the performance in...

@mkow Thanks for pointing this out. We agree it is a possible attack vector, but with low priority at this point. @dimakuv We'd be happy to test a trivial implementation...

@dimakuv Sorry for the delay. I've encountered severe performance issues (+100x overhead) while running `geth` from an encrypted mount point (this was tested with upstream gramine, so not related to...