[Docs] Spot/interruptible docs imply retries come from the user retry budget

[andrewwdye]

Description

In the spot/interruptible docs we have the following note

If you set retries=n, for instance, and the task gets preempted repeatedly, Flyte will retry on a preemptible/spot instance n-1 times and for the last attempt will retry your task on a non-spot (regular) instance. Please note that tasks will only be retried if at least one retry is allowed using the retries parameter in the task decorator.

This implies that interruptible retries come from the user-specified user error retry budget. However, in practice spot interruptions are taken from the system retry budget.

Are you sure this issue hasn't been raised already?

• [X] Yes

Have you read the Code of Conduct?

• [X] Yes

[github-actions[bot]]

Hello 👋, this issue has been inactive for over 9 months. To help maintain a clean and focused backlog, we'll be marking this issue as stale and will engage on it to decide if it is still applicable. Thank you for your contribution and understanding! 🙏

[davidmirror-ops]

Keep it open

[RaghavMangla]

Hi! I would like to work on this issue

[davidmirror-ops]

@RaghavMangla thanks for your willingness to contribute. Considering you already have 6 issues assigned to you, and following the principle of "first come first serve" we'd like to encourage you to send PRs for the issues where you are already an assignee and then, if no one has taken this one, we can assign to you. Thanks in advance :)

[RaghavMangla]

Yes, sure

On Sat, 5 Oct, 2024, 17:31 David Espejo, @.***> wrote:

@RaghavMangla https://github.com/RaghavMangla thanks for your willingness to contribute. Considering you already have 6 issues assigned to you, and following the principle of "first come first serve" we'd like to encourage you to send PRs for the issues where you are already an assignee and then, if no one has taken this one, we can assign to you. Thanks in advance :)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/issues/3956#issuecomment-2395032988, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXGSZMNBD72P3UPL2LDEBZ3ZZ7IKHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA3QCARIGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOJVGAZTEOJYHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[RaghavMangla]

??

On Sat, 5 Oct, 2024, 20:00 Raghav Mangla, @.***> wrote:

Yes, sure

On Sat, 5 Oct, 2024, 17:31 David Espejo, @.***> wrote:

@RaghavMangla https://github.com/RaghavMangla thanks for your willingness to contribute. Considering you already have 6 issues assigned to you, and following the principle of "first come first serve" we'd like to encourage you to send PRs for the issues where you are already an assignee and then, if no one has taken this one, we can assign to you. Thanks in advance :)

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/flyteorg/flyte/issues/3956#issuecomment-2395032988, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AXGSZMNBD72P3UPL2LDEBZ3ZZ7IKHAVCNFSM6AAAAAA3QCARIGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOJVGAZTEOJYHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

[ap0calypse8]

i want to work on this issue

[davidmirror-ops]

@ap0calypse8 thank you!