fluidvanadium
fluidvanadium
There is a possibility a test here could be flaky. Due to something not understood. I dont think it is.
Hey @dorianvp , thanks for your attention! Seems like this test happens to run up against the same network upgrade issue I have heard chatter about! I hope it is...
I would like to upgrade the tests from 'ignored' to 'ignored in CI for now'. But this code should merge.
Read, tested, looks good. But needs one more pair of eyes on it.
Aha! Looks like when the test fails, proptest tries again because it wants to find the minimal failure case. Too bad each try takes multiple minutes.... Now if only there...
This issue is making it more difficult to debug NU 6.1.
This issue is still relevant.
Hey @james-katz , I am on this right now. I am looking for the dizzy source code to determine what field is needed.
Is it possible that `address_index` is the same as `account_id` ? Researching now. Answer: No. Related field.
For transparent transactions, correct? Transparent coins `coin_summaries` currently have an address_index field.