flagxor
Load cannot be called twice in one block
If block 1 of blocks.fb contains the following code, it works as expected:
2 3 thru
If, on the other hand, it contains the following, only block 2 is loaded:
2 load 3 load
Expected: both block 2 and block 3 should be loaded.
Why it matters: I want block 1 to be a system load block, essentially configuring my system. Typically I load several individual blocks and several series of blocks using load and thru repeatedly in block 1. This makes a Forth system very flexible.
Hi vkichline,
I'm having trouble reproducing this. Which platform are you seeing this on?
Esp32Forth on a variety of chips. Load is just: block 1024 evaluate, so if the loaded block contains a load, there is no way to continue at the next statement once the inner load is completed. gForth and others maintain a list to unwind.
On Feb 24, 2024, at 10:57 AM, Brad Nelson @.***> wrote:
Hi vkichline,
I'm having trouble reproducing this. Which platform are you seeing this on?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/flagxor/ueforth/issues/53#issuecomment-1962543995, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCSFDWC7CJHPEKALKMUMITYVIZZHAVCNFSM6AAAAAAY3T6HQSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNRSGU2DGOJZGU. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
Here is a proposed repo case:
Screen 1: .” Screen 1” cr 2 load .” Required: print this line.” Cr
Screen 2: .” Screen 2” cr
———
Expected: Screen 1 Screen 2 Required: print this line.
Actual: Screen 1 Screen 2
On Feb 24, 2024, at 12:28 PM, Van Kichline @.***> wrote:
Esp32Forth on a variety of chips. Load is just: block 1024 evaluate, so if the loaded block contains a load, there is no way to continue at the next statement once the inner load is completed. gForth and others maintain a list to unwind.
On Feb 24, 2024, at 10:57 AM, Brad Nelson @.***> wrote:
Hi vkichline,
I'm having trouble reproducing this. Which platform are you seeing this on?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/flagxor/ueforth/issues/53#issuecomment-1962543995, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABCSFDWC7CJHPEKALKMUMITYVIZZHAVCNFSM6AAAAAAY3T6HQSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTSNRSGU2DGOJZGU. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>