Mykhailo Matviiv
Mykhailo Matviiv
I have mixed feelings about this feature. It's the same request as we had before #180. The reasons why we didn't implement it originally are still valid. So far I'm...
At this point we can't remove attributes requirement even if we wanted to because it will break all existing users. We can add the change from this PR to make...
While I can see how this can be beneficial for someone, I'm not a fan of this feature in its current state. Currently, there is a simple rule - propertied...
Thanks for submitting the PR @devtekve. Changing target version is a breaking change. I'm ok with doing that but we'll need to think about all breaking changes we want to...
Closing this PR because .net8 migration was implemented in a more lightweight #263.
I'm really glad to see performance improvements in AWS SDK V4. It's not easy to make such changes in an old codebase and I think @normj and his team are...
Hey @bbdaniell, sorry but I'm not really following what are you trying to achieve and why can't you implicitly use the `ObjectDdbConverter`. Do you mind writing some code examples of...
Hi @diopolgg. Thanks for reporting it. Since it's a minor issue that can be mitigated using the low-level API I can't commit to a timeline for adding a high-level API....
It's now available in [v0.9.16](https://www.nuget.org/packages/EfficientDynamoDb/0.9.16)
Currently, there is no way to view the actual DynamoDB expression being generated. This feature has been on our agenda since the start, but implementing it is challenging due to...