finitemonkey
finitemonkey
Thanks, that would be great! Yeah, I've generally found it all to work really well, with no major problems and a couple of pleasant surprises. Builder has broadly worked for...
Thanks for that - the discussion on the GNOME board is really interesting. Just to note that the only reason for creating the main window that way in the example...
Thank you for your time on this, it is very much appreciated, I totally understand what you're saying (although I have a slightly different view about the low number of...
Ah, sorry, I wasn't too clear there - I didn't mean that I think there are really lots of hidden users - I meant that perhaps it doesn't matter too...
That is great news! Happy to help if there is anything I can do (e.g. testing).
This is great, thank you! But in that patch, the `g_object_ref` line is commented out?
I'd like to say, "ah, I see!", but I don't quite yet! :-) Thanks for the explanation though, I'll take some time tomorrow to look at the code while reading...
> I have to do some other work now No worries - I'll try to have a look and see if I can make some progress. I know what it's...
Actually... thinking about it, memoization would mean the the underlying widget is never freed, wouldn't it? Because the memoization machinery (however implemented) would need to hold a reference to it...
In fact, does it matter that the references are different? Provided the ref counts of the underlying objects are correctly incremented and decremented when they are created and destroyed, shouldn't...