Replace plaintext auth tokens with HttpOnly cookies
Overview
Currently authentication tokens are sent in plain text format. This can be a security vulnerability because attackers can run malicious JS scripts in the browser to access the user's token and perform session hijacking. A recommended solution for this vulnerability is to send auth tokens in a Cookie with the HttpOnly flag set. HttpOnly cookies’ content is not accessible from JavaScript, preventing XSS attacks from stealing these tokens.
Backend changes:
- We use the original
create_access_tokenfunction to generate the JWT token but instead of returning it directly in the/loginendpoint, we return a JSONResponse with an http-only cookie, which contains the token. - In the updated
get_current_userfunction, now there is anAPIKeyCookiedependency, but the way we decode the JWT token didn't change. - I implemented the
/logoutendpoint which deletes the cookie. - The cookie has a predefined expiration – after it expires, the user gets logged out automatically when they try to navigate to another page (which sends an authenticated request to the backend).
- Updated the backend tests accordingly
Frontend changes:
- In the frontend API calls, we should set the
withCredentials=trueparameter to include the cookies in the requests - Instead of sending the token in the headers, we should use the cookies request parameter
- Instead of storing the
access_tokeninlocalStorage(the token is not accessible from JS anymore), now we store theis_authenticatedboolean value and use it to check authentication and remove it during logout
Before:
After:
what happens to the swagger docs using this implementation. when we want authenticate it seems like pasting any text it authorizes automatically no request is sent to the server.
After some reserach i found this https://swagger.io/docs/specification/v3_0/authentication/cookie-authentication/
is seems like the swagger docs does not support this.
This pull request has a merge conflict that needs to be resolved.
Thanks for the interest! I think it would be better to have this change in the specific project you're building and not here in the template. For now, I'll pass on this one. Thanks! :coffee: