ethdebug
Project lacks process
How will work progress with this effort? How will we know if work is progressing?
Standards groups operate in projects with processes. These processes get documented. Sometimes a meeting schedule exists. This ethdebug project, in its infancy, has none of that yet.
Likely this will also need to include a list of responsible/consulted/etc. parties
I suggest you aim for something like "rough consensus" as a decision-making process. The critical bit then is to work out who decides when there is rough consensus.
Is the decision-making process for merging a PR documented somewhere? That seems important for anyone who wants to contribute but doesn't start out being part of the "in-crowd" ...