essej
STOP/PLAY button.
Hi, why is there no STOP button? There is only one from PAUSE. I think a STOP is necessary to be able to assign a MIDI CC to it. Thanks.
Originally there was only Mute (time keeps going so that things are still in sync)… people eventually talked me into adding Pause which is effecfively stop. You have the choice on how to resume it, either unpause (to start from where it was) or retrigger (to start from loop begin).
If you want to stop all loops you bind a midi control to pause for All loops.
Thanks for answering, so far I programmed my MIDI PEDALBOARD, to only have 2 pedals in LOOP MODE: RECORD and STOP/PLAY (although I had to assign it to PAUSE in sooperlooper). Using "TRIG" would imply adding another pedal, but if there is no other option I will have to do it. Thanks for answering.
I think what SL needs is a pause_or_trigger command, where it will pause if it's playing, and trigger if it's not.
I think what SL needs is a pause_or_trigger command, where it will pause if it's playing, and trigger if it's not.
Yes, it would be a good advance to minimize the number of pedals. Now that I think about it, what you suggest would be the same as a STOP / PLAY button, good idea.
This would be useful for cases in which, due to human error, the PAUSE button is pressed late, then restarting the loop from 0 the next time it is pressed is the solution, that is why a single STOP / PLAY or PAUSE / TRIG button it would be good.
I think what SL needs is a pause_or_trigger command, where it will pause if it's playing, and trigger if it's not.
Yes, it would be a good advance to minimize the number of pedals. Now that I think about it, what you suggest would be the same as a STOP / PLAY button, good idea.
Yes, it's the same thing since the restarting would happen with trigger from start.
Oh, I forgot about the existing solution! The command called mute_trigger... which mutes if playing, triggers from start if muted. There you go!
The command called mute_trigger... which mutes if playing, triggers from start if muted. There you go!
I will try.
But doing just one MUTE keep the risk of getting XRUN any longer. The continuous playback even when is in MUTE puts unnecessary strain on the processor.
The command called mute_trigger... which mutes if playing, triggers from start if muted. There you go!
I will try.
But doing just one MUTE keep the risk of getting XRUN any longer. The continuous playback even when is in MUTE puts unnecessary strain on the processor.
I really don't think that is concern at all, what actually happens in the code in the different states does not really affect CPU load at all. I wrote SL back in the early 2000s and it wasn't an issue with the hardware then (it was pretty low CPU usage even then). I don't know what hardware you are using now, but I'm 90% confident your concerns are unfounded.
Okay, I'll try mute_trigger.
My project uses Guitarix + Hydrogen + Sooperlooper. Sometimes when the 3 programs are active I have XRUN that feel strong, I suppose then that Hydrogen is the culprit. I use a board with an Intel 1037u (2013), but the idea in the future is to bring the headless project to Raspberry Pi:
https://github.com/fernando-inf/ARDUINO-GUITARIX-MIDI_PEDALBOARD
Greetings, thanks for responding.