Can we Have a release version

[shafeequ]

Team,

Since the popularity and usage of this are increasing, are you planning to have a Release version so that the consumer of this utility can use it?

Thanks,

[emil-e]

I don't really have any such plans given that I don't really have time to work on RapidCheck these days.

[shafeequ]

Thanks for the quick response, Just a thought with the current master state we can have one release tag ?

[ezzieyguywuf]

I don't really have any such plans given that I don't really have time to work on RapidCheck these days.

Is this still the case? If so, are you interested in adding other people as maintainers to the project?

[emil-e]

I don't really have any such plans given that I don't really have time to work on RapidCheck these days.

Is this still the case? If so, are you interested in adding other people as maintainers to the project?

I would be very much open to that if I find someone appropriate, yes. It'd be a shame for this project just to rot because I'm busy. Are you interested or know anyone else who is interested?

[ezzieyguywuf]

I don't really have any such plans given that I don't really have time to work on RapidCheck these days.

Is this still the case? If so, are you interested in adding other people as maintainers to the project?

I would be very much open to that if I find someone appropriate, yes. It'd be a shame for this project just to rot because I'm busy. Are you interested or know anyone else who is interested?

I am definitely interested. I would love to work on getting an official release, as well as cleaning up some of the pull requests and issues.

[alerque]

This library has become a build dependency for projects like nix, which does have stable releases in distro packages. Now distros (like Arch Linux which I package for) are forced with dealing with packaging a library with no upstream versioning just to build other versioned packages. A tag now and then would be very much appreciated.