ebu
Missing descriptions for some Classes
Dear EBUCorePlus Team.
during a QA check of the EBUCorePlus Model in the DEV branch, I found some missing descriptions. Please let me know when you added them to ultimately approve through a new QA check run.
Best Regards, Alexander Schulze
ID | Label | Issue http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Article | Article | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#BehindTheScenes | BehindTheScenes | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Bonus | Bonus | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#CampaignPackage | Campaign package | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#EditorialExtra | Editorial Extra | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#EditorialWork | Editorial work | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Footage | Footage | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Outtakes | Outtakes | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Post | Post | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Promotion | Promotion | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Provenance | Provenance | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#PublicationLog | Publication log | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Reminder | Reminder | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#EditorialSegment | [missing rdfs:label] | Description empty
Perfect :-) After removing these classes we just run the QA suite again and identify the remaining ones. Just give me a ping once the classes are removed, and I'll be ready.
Considering #388 the list of missing descriptions is reduced to:
http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Article | Article | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#CampaignPackage | Campaign package | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#EditorialExtra | Editorial Extra | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#EditorialWork | Editorial work | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Post | Post | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Promotion | Promotion | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Provenance | Provenance | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#PublicationLog | Publication log | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#Reminder | Reminder | Description empty http://www.ebu.ch/metadata/ontologies/ebucoreplus#EditorialSegment | [missing rdfs:label] | Description empty
When I examined the list, I found that we had decided to use skos:definition and skos:example instead of dcterms:description. Please check out: https://github.com/ebu/ebucoreplus#how-we-use-annotation-properties-for-definition-examples-and-description
However, during examination I came across 3 short-comings for Annotations, which I cleaned-up in the linked pull request.
@alexander-schulze : Please adapt the QC criteria to NOT check for existence of dcterms:description, but for existence of skos:definition and skos:example in all three languages. Thank you!