Deployment Failed, Permission denied (publickey,password).
while doing GitHub actions to link with my digital ocean server im getting this error
Run easingthemes/[email protected] [general] GITHUB_WORKSPACE: /home/runner/work/laravelTest/laravelTest [SSH] Creating /home/runner/.ssh dir in /home/runner/work/laravelTest/laravelTest ✅ [SSH] dir created. [SSH] Creating /home/runner/.ssh/known_hosts file in /home/runner/work/laravelTest/laravelTest ✅ [SSH] file created. ✅ Ssh key added to .ssh` dir /home/runner/.ssh/deploy_key
[Rsync] Starting Rsync Action: /home/runner/work/laravelTest/laravelTest/ to @:***
[Rsync] exluding folders
⚠️ [Rsync] error: rsync exited with code 255
⚠️ [Rsync] stderr: Warning: Permanently added '***' (ED25519) to the list of known hosts.
Load key "/home/runner/.ssh/deploy_key": error in libcrypto
Permission denied, please try again.
Permission denied, please try again.
@: Permission denied (publickey,password).
rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [sender]
rsync error: unexplained error (code 255) at io.c(231) [sender=3.2.7]
⚠️ [Rsync] stdout:
⚠️ [Rsync] cmd: rsync /home/runner/work/laravelTest/laravelTest/ @:*** --rsh "ssh -p 22 -i /home/runner/.ssh/deploy_key -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no" --recursive --exclude= -rltgoDzvO
1: 0xb090e0 node::Abort() [/home/runner/runners/2.311.0/externals/node16/bin/node]
2: 0xb79379 [/home/runner/runners/2.311.0/externals/node16/bin/node]
3: 0xd3df8e [/home/runner/runners/2.311.0/externals/node16/bin/node]
4: 0xd3f3af v8::internal::Builtin_HandleApiCall(int, unsigned long*, v8::internal::Isolate*) [/home/runner/runners/2.311.0/externals/node16/bin/node]`
- I verified my private ssh key
- I added the public key to the authorized keys
- I added the key identity to the config file (IdentityFile)
- I gave the permissions to the target dir file
- I installed and upgraded the rsync
- I verified the username and the host ip
- Ssh key is in RSA format
- I Enabled Password Authentication
- tried to add space at the end of the private key
same issue :( PLEASE HELP
we are having the same problem
Same issue, solved it by adding a new line at the end of private key.
Same issue, solved it by adding a new line at the end of private key.
me too
Same issue, solved it by adding a new line at the end of private key.
it works for me
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.
Reopened, since it still require manual workaround.
in my webhost hetzner is working but in 1&1 webhost getting error
Should we consider making some adjustments to our server?
premisson denied to change sshd_config however ...
1&1 ( ionos )
cat /etc/ssh/sshd_config
# Package generated configuration file
# See the sshd_config(5) manpage for details
# What ports, IPs and protocols we listen for
Port 22
# Use these options to restrict which interfaces/protocols sshd will bind to
#ListenAddress ::
#ListenAddress 0.0.0.0
# 2007-11-05 cg: kein SSHv1 mehr (HOST.342)
Protocol 2
# HostKeys for protocol version 2
HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_rsa_key
HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key
HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ecdsa_key
HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_ed25519_key
Compression yes
# 2015-12-09 TECCM-11090 :: 2 ssh client alive options
ClientAliveInterval 600
ClientAliveCountMax 3
# This NEEDS to be LOCAL0
SyslogFacility LOCAL0
LogLevel VERBOSE
# Authentication:
LoginGraceTime 30
PermitRootLogin no
StrictModes yes
AllowGroups ftpusers
PubkeyAuthentication yes
#AuthorizedKeysFile %h/.ssh/authorized_keys
# Don't read the user's ~/.rhosts and ~/.shosts files
IgnoreRhosts yes
# similar for protocol version 2
HostbasedAuthentication no
# Uncomment if you don't trust ~/.ssh/known_hosts for RhostsRSAAuthentication
#IgnoreUserKnownHosts yes
# To enable empty passwords, change to yes (NOT RECOMMENDED)
PermitEmptyPasswords no
# Change to yes to enable challenge-response passwords (beware issues with
# some PAM modules and threads)
ChallengeResponseAuthentication no
# Change to no to disable tunnelled clear text passwords
PasswordAuthentication yes
# Kerberos options
#KerberosAuthentication no
#KerberosGetAFSToken no
#KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes
#KerberosTicketCleanup yes
# GSSAPI options
#GSSAPIAuthentication no
#GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes
AllowTcpForwarding no
GatewayPorts no
X11Forwarding no
X11DisplayOffset 10
PrintMotd no
PrintLastLog no
TCPKeepAlive yes
PermitUserEnvironment no
#MaxStartups 10:30:60
#Banner /etc/issue.net
# Allow client to pass locale environment variables
AcceptEnv LANG LC_*
# Notes for subsystem sftp: We need to fulfill the constraint given by
# rssh that the executable MUST READ /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server
# exactly, and therefore cannot be prepended with fakechroot
# directly. Therefore, we do all the details (fakechroot, ...) in a
# wrapper script. See package ui-infong-openssh-fakechroot-wrapper
# for details.
#
Subsystem sftp /usr/lib/openssh/sftp-server
# Set this to 'yes' to enable PAM authentication, account processing,
# and session processing. If this is enabled, PAM authentication will
# be allowed through the ChallengeResponseAuthentication and
# PasswordAuthentication. Depending on your PAM configuration,
# PAM authentication via ChallengeResponseAuthentication may bypass
# the setting of "PermitRootLogin without-password".
# If you just want the PAM account and session checks to run without
# PAM authentication, then enable this but set PasswordAuthentication
# and ChallengeResponseAuthentication to 'no'.
UsePAM yes
# Hide comment part of the version string: show `SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.9p1'
# instead of `SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.9p1 Debian-10+deb10u1~ui10+2`.
DebianBanner no
in 1&1 (ionos) : cd ~/.ssh -bash: cd: /kunden/homepages/8/xxxx/htdocs/.ssh: Permission denied
in hetzner : going to /ssh if you need more info let me please know
Same issue, solved it by adding a new line at the end of private key.
Is this a bug? Why we need an extra line after -----END OPENSSH PRIVATE KEY----- ? Could this be maybe mentioned at the docs? I struggled 1 week because of this anomaly. Thanks for the right hint @davyxx3 👍
Can you try SCRIPT_BEFORE param, eg SCRIPT_BEFORE: ls. This will force known_hosts update, adding your host via ssh-keyscan.
Added info into REDME.
.
Probably the same issue: https://github.com/easingthemes/ssh-deploy/issues/143
i got the same error Deployment Failed, Permission denied (publickey). All of the solutions presented above have failed. i tried "ssh-keygen -t rsa -b 4096" to generate a key pair and it worked out. but "ssh-keygen -m PEM -t rsa -b 4096" still not works for me.
@chungyeong in my case none of the solutions worked and also changing the key from PEM to RSA also didn't work :( My host: Ubuntu 22
I solved the authorisation failure problem by first adding a new line at the end of the private key, after which I also needed to run cat id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keys on the server.
The reason why this is needed, I thought ssh-deploy must be going password free login with the help of a private key, I tried to log in to the server on my computer via the private key as well, and expected this error, so I checked the relevant error messages, and finally I found out that I need to copy the public key paired with the private key to authorized_keys to open up the authorisation.
I solved the authorisation failure problem by first adding a new line at the end of the private key, after which I also needed to run
cat id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keyson the server.我首先在私钥末尾添加了一个新行,然后还需要在服务器上运行cat id_rsa.pub >> authorized_keys,从而解决了授权失败问题。The reason why this is needed, I thought ssh-deploy must be going password free login with the help of a private key, I tried to log in to the server on my computer via the private key as well, and expected this error, so I checked the relevant error messages, and finally I found out that I need to copy the public key paired with the private key to authorized_keys to open up the authorisation.之所以需要这个,我以为ssh-deploy一定是在私钥的帮助下去免密码登录,我也尝试通过私钥登录到我电脑上的服务器,并预料到这个错误,所以我检查了相关的错误信息,最后我发现我需要复制与私钥配对的公钥才能authorized_keys打开授权。
@easingthemes @chungyeong @tecnologiaflashcardsconcursos
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days.