David Singer
David Singer
agreed, we might like to clarify that
Hi Mark, I think you may be under a misapprehension. The statement track is not exclusive to the AB and TAG: it is a track available to any chartered group...
I still think we don't understand each other; I am fairly sure I don't understand you. I think you might be saying that if an elected group (as opposed to...
I think the result of a policy that said that if an elected group (AB, TAG) wanted to get W3C consensus on something, they'd have to write a charter, get...
Thanks Mark, responses to some points inline > To give a concrete example, the Vision document is being developed by the AB. They are doing everything they can to solicit...
I know this is controversial, but have we considered re-phrasing simply to say what we mean? That is, we either agree to publish it, or we don't (and if we...
yes, perhaps we should have advice that readers should process the fields that they recognize, and if there is extra data in a box after that, ignore it (presuming that...
OK, two things confused here. (a) should a reader parse what it recognizes and ignore the rest? (b) are you allowed to put garbage after the last parsed field when...
I was going to say that's fair, if fields are added then the version should be bumped, and no-one should be trying to parse them under v0. But we _don't_...
I think that in your initial text there is a good direction, that there is no opposition. At least x% respond (80%?). At least y% vote in favor (positive support,...