drcpu-github

> > If we go the route of slashing everyone with a higher power too > > Then your suggestion is to apply slashing to everyone in the `rf` commitee...

> I had this same concern, and that's why the article about the Witnet P2P Bucketing System was linked above. I'm inclined to agree with the article, I just wanted...

> `self.chain_state.unwrap().highest_block_checkpoint` This may be interesting (and workable) as an approach. I was not sure how we could increment the `rf` for nodes that were synchronizing (either from start or...

> Because block proposers are sovereign to decide what dr-commit transactions to include, if any at all, there's no actual possible way to power-slash reluctant witnesses. I remember there was...

Here is a list of items which I think are required for the Witnet 2.0 release: - [x] A way to handle data requests which require too many witnesses. This...

> * Introduce new protocol constant: COLLATERAL_RATIO_U8. > * Ignore DRO's collateral field. > * Compute DR's collateral as DRO.witness_reward * COLLATERAL_RATIO_U8. > * Ignore DRO's commit_and_reveal_fee field. > *...