dorianps

@stnava Looks like there are some issues with the stability of my sparseness optimization routine. I think this may be related to the cross-validation splits which are stratified using a...

@Fatimah-A how are those nFolds=6 runs going? It looked like results were more similar with 6 folds. Do you want to give a try with nFolds=10, cvRepetitions=3? In theory you...

The results may have tiny variability, but should not be grossly unstable. When they change so much it makes me think that one of the two sides (local or HPC)...

Very good, looks like the outcome is more stable with more nFolds. Now, of course, you have different outcomes, one null the other producing a map, but that is another...

Looks like WRAT is still not doing ok with substantial instability. BNT also seems to have flipped to positive sparseness once. The null result you got, I have no idea...

Thank you for trying this @Fatimah-A . The results show that BNT is more stable and has higher CVcorrelation with positive sparseness search. This means that the previous BNT searches...

Thanks @Fatimah-A Still doesn't look good. I have the WRAT scores from a post above. Can you send me the lesion maps and the BNT scores, too, so I can...

Aaron, apologies but I have not worked on it yet. Between the regular work duties and the limited working-from-home time this has fallen lower in the priorities. It definitely needs...

I am not sure what is happening. Searching for that BLAS error code in Google does not produce much to go on. The problem is only in the regression routine,...

Please post the full log if you still see errors.