Harry Pierson
Harry Pierson
Please add #549, #550, #551
Please add #566 and #567
Please add #574
Thanks for the link @roman-khimov. I knew that I had seen this issue somewhere before
These warnings are marked as hidden (specifically listed as `hidden CS8019`). Would be nice if `nccs` didn't show hidden warnings.
It feels like a better solution to this would be an ABORT with message opcode in NeoVM. Changing the behavior of assert depending on call flags seems sketchy
> We should not modify its original semantics to confuse most C# developers. I'm a fan of this proposal, but @erikzhang is correct that C# developers would not expect properties...
FYI, I'm having problems with properties + nccs. I will try and build a minimal repro and open a new issue
> I think using properties will give developers a sense of not having to consume too much GAS. But reading the storage will actually consume more GAS. This seems like...
Neo.dll drags along lots of dependencies that are only needed for running a full node. I helped @logikonline produce a custom neo.dll that removes the ASP.NET dependency so that can...