fix dplr: set the positions of WCs to those of the real atoms in end_of_step
Thie PR aims at fixing #3679.
Fix dplr assumes that the WCs exacts reside on the positions of the real atoms at the end of each step, and assigns the positions of the WCs according to the output of the DeepTensor models.
The current implementation sets the positions of WCs to the positions of real atoms in the post_integrate function. As a result, get_valid_pairs will raise error when using a restart file.
This PR fixes this issue. Instead of residing the WCs on real atoms in post_integrate, it does so in the end_of_step function.
Summary by CodeRabbit
-
New Features
- Introduced a new method for setting up pre-exchange operations, enhancing simulation lifecycle management.
-
Changes
- Renamed the
post_integratemethod topre_exchangeto better reflect its role in the simulation process. - Updated mask settings to improve clarity and context within the simulation lifecycle.
- Renamed the
-
Chores
- Updated ownership context for Docker image in the build workflow configuration.
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough
Walkthrough
The changes involve renaming the post_integrate() method to pre_exchange() in the FixDPLR class, updating its associated mask from POST_INTEGRATE to PRE_EXCHANGE, and introducing a new method setup_pre_exchange(). Additionally, the GitHub Actions workflow has been modified to reflect a change in the repository owner for building and pushing a Docker image.
Changes
| Files | Change Summary |
|---|---|
| source/lmp/fix_dplr.cpp | Renamed post_integrate() to pre_exchange(), changed mask from POST_INTEGRATE to PRE_EXCHANGE, and added setup_pre_exchange(). |
| source/lmp/fix_dplr.h | Renamed post_integrate() to pre_exchange() in class declaration and added setup_pre_exchange(). |
| .github/workflows/build_wheel.yml | Updated Docker image ownership from deepmodeling to Yi-FanLi in the workflow configuration. |
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
-
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it. -
Generate unit testing code for this file. -
Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
-
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:-
@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file. -
@coderabbitai modularize this function.
-
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:-
@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase. -
@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code. -
@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format. -
@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
-
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
-
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR. -
@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews. -
@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository. -
@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again. -
@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR. -
@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments. -
@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository. -
@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Codecov Report
Attention: Patch coverage is 86.84211% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
Project coverage is 84.07%. Comparing base (
dabedd2) to head (97527e6). Report is 135 commits behind head on devel.
| Files with missing lines | Patch % | Lines |
|---|---|---|
| source/lmp/fix_dplr.cpp | 86.84% | 1 Missing and 4 partials :warning: |
Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## devel #4084 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 84.40% 84.07% -0.33%
==========================================
Files 570 570
Lines 53071 53099 +28
Branches 3054 3059 +5
==========================================
- Hits 44794 44643 -151
- Misses 7318 7494 +176
- Partials 959 962 +3
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.