Wikimedia Commons extraction

[jlareck]

Implemented first version of Wikimedia Commons Infobox Extractor. I also configured the properties file which contains extractors that are used for data extraction from Wikimedia Commons files.

[sonarqubecloud[bot]]

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities (and 0 Security Hotspots to review)
9 Code Smells

No Coverage information
73.9% Duplication

[JJ-Author]

@coderabbitai full review

[coderabbitai[bot]]

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

[!WARNING]

Rate limit exceeded

@JJ-Author has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 19 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb0e463d07f68cb2e10ee840b4a13fd5f3ff7a5a and 5b31dd53b8cb45b5f2ba81d69a00405a47b46166.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• core/src/main/scala/org/dbpedia/extraction/mappings/WikimediaCommonsInfoboxExtractor.scala (1 hunks)
• dump/extraction.commons.properties (1 hunks)

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• [ ] Create PR with unit tests
• [ ] Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• [ ] Commit unit tests in branch gsoc-mykola

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}