David Andreoletti
David Andreoletti
> the message should be fixed, then, to properly describe the issue Updated. Apologies again. > there isn't a generalizable way to test if a set of PEP 440 version...
> Would you like to submit a PR based on the suggestion above ? @CAM-Gerlach Yes. Waiting on @regebro's green light.
> First-time contributors need a maintainer to approve running workflows @CAM-Gerlach / @regebro your approval is needed to run CI jobs.
> this is really an entirely separate, independent check. You are right. The initial version tried not to break compatibility with current release: package without a "python_requires" are well "package"...
@CAM-Gerlach Updates provided. Once approved, should I squash the PR's commits or will you merge-squash it ?
@cosmicBboy PR provided. Let me know when you want to discuss this.
@cosmicBboy I think @dantheand's solution is elegant and support most data types. Perhaps, ```class_col: Series[TestEnum]``` should be a syntactic sugar for ```class_col: Series[pd.StringDtype] = pandera.Field(isin=TestEnum)``` ?
That would be fantastic!
> To clarify: this can be fixed in asyncpg. Is there a plan in place at the moment ?
> Is kopia snapshot verify is enough to be sure repository isn't broken or one have to do real restoration to be make sure? @CompuRoot Yes, I would like to...