seqcli Publish an ARM docker container for seqcli

This is needed for https://github.com/datalust/sqelf/issues/94

We already have ARM binaries available, but currently just build and publish an x86-based Docker container. We should be able to use the same manifest approach we do with the Seq container to stitch up a single image from multiple architectures.

Feb 03 '22 23:02 KodrAus

I'm not sure if this is now complete with #228 having been merged, but if it is, something is not quite right: Docker Hub is showing that the image for seqcli has two variants, both for linux/amd64, and the -arm64 tags (eg. 2022.1.567-arm64) are showing up as for linux/amd64 as well.

Mar 29 '22 07:03 charleskorn

Thanks for the heads up @charleskorn. Something doesn't look right there does it. I'll take a look :eyes:

Mar 29 '22 22:03 KodrAus

Hey @KodrAus, I'm trying to use seqcli docker container on m1 mac, but I'm getting this -

> docker run datalust/seqcli
Unable to find image 'datalust/seqcli:latest' locally
latest: Pulling from datalust/seqcli
docker: no matching manifest for linux/arm64/v8 in the manifest list entries.
See 'docker run --help'.

I see a few PRs merged as part of this, and I see the arm64 dockerfile, is this a known issue?

Jul 20 '22 02:07 ankithkonda

Hi @ankithkonda :wave: Hmm, it looks like our seqcli images are targeting arm/v8 rather than arm64/v8. I'll dig into it and see what's going on there.

Jul 20 '22 03:07 KodrAus

Thanks for the quick response @KodrAus, much appreciated 🙂

Jul 20 '22 05:07 ankithkonda

It looks like things are fixed for images coming out of CI now. I've opened #247 to get a stable release together. I'll loop back here once that's published.

Jul 21 '22 22:07 KodrAus

Looks like I missed looping back here, but we have stable ARM images published and working again :tada:

Apr 05 '23 21:04 KodrAus