Enhancement: force hub index file update if hub data upgrade is forced

[nox-x]

I ran into an issue by having a hub-index file younger than 24h within the docker container and needed to restart it while the hub holds newer data. So this results in conflicting hashes for parsers loaded by a collection.

Setting the environment var DO_HUB_UPGRADE to true it just forces the already (old) indexed collections to upgrade, but not upgrading the index file. I think if someone forcing to get the newest data from the hub, than the local index should be as fresh as possible.

With this PR setting DO_HUB_UPGRADE to true also forces the local hub index to get updated on starting the docker container.

[github-actions[bot]]

@nox-x: There are no 'kind' label on this PR. You need a 'kind' label to generate the release automatically.

• /kind feature
• /kind enhancement
• /kind refactoring
• /kind fix
• /kind chore
• /kind dependencies

Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

[github-actions[bot]]

@nox-x: There are no area labels on this PR. You can add as many areas as you see fit.

• /area agent
• /area local-api
• /area cscli
• /area appsec
• /area security
• /area configuration

Details

I am a bot created to help the crowdsecurity developers manage community feedback and contributions. You can check out my manifest file to understand my behavior and what I can do. If you want to use this for your project, you can check out the BirthdayResearch/oss-governance-bot repository.

[nox-x]

/kind enhancement /area configuration

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 49.87%. Comparing base (1b01041) to head (89142ac). Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3124       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   32.05%   49.87%   +17.82%     
===========================================
  Files         320      321        +1     
  Lines       37662    37664        +2     
===========================================
+ Hits        12073    18786     +6713     
+ Misses      24287    17055     -7232     
- Partials     1302     1823      +521     

Flag	Coverage Δ
bats	38.47% <ø> (?)
unit-linux	34.42% <ø> (ø)
unit-windows	29.06% <ø> (+0.01%)	:arrow_up:

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.