crowdcode-de
Cartridge kissmda-cartridges-simple-java: add Stereotype "Boundary" to create DTO (Data Transfer Object) or VO (Value Object)
Isn't a DTO a UML boundary object? Look at this page http://www.cs.sjsu.edu/~pearce/modules/lectures/ooa/analysis/ecb.htm.
Yes correct. DTO == TO == Value Object == Value == Boundary Object. I thought it is good to have these elements in our UML language:
Entity, Service, Value
I don't think so that a Value object is equal to a Dto. See http://www.adam-bien.com/roller/abien/entry/value_object_vs_data_transfer.
Ahhh.... sometimes I think that those JEE design patterns are typical of "over engineering" in our enterprise software development. Also the whole specifications with JEE. My analogy: do we need a specification for Android OS so that every vendor can implement "other" Android OS? Nope! So who needs those JEE servers from IBM, Oracle, JBoss, etc.? You only need ONE JEE server just like ONE Android OS. You can still do your own Android OS just like Linux because it's Open Source but you don't need such over specifications like JEE... I think I need to blog this ;-)
OK, @idueppe you are right. We should make "boundary". Here is a good example: http://goo.gl/kpiOEK