Charlie Pauvert

> @cpauvert do you mean that the references aren't hyperlinked? > Hi! Well yes, but this is a consequence of the issue. I meant that the references are hard coded...

> This seems to be also the case for [...] Good catch thanks! Do you want to create issues for each of them or a [general issue with tasks lists](https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/about-task-lists#about-issue-task-lists)...

We discussed the problem in https://github.com/NFDI4Microbiota/nfdi4microbiota-knowledge-base/issues/179#issuecomment-1968634117 already, go for the second option :muscle: EDIT: or if need be, the link goes to the ignore files and the bot is not...

> Done, main branch now deploys to knowledgebase.nfdi4microbiota.de with fixes for the mentioned discrepancies. > thanks @elhossary > Now, I suggest to make the github pages to reflect dev branch...

Hey @UParmaksiz it seems a couple of links you added to the digital preservation page are not working, do you have alternatives? Thanks,

After a discussion, we plan to try to include the tools on `bio.tools` (see #84). I'm starting with GUNC as a first prototype to showcase today for the sprint. **EDIT**...

Compiling a list of tools that are already there (tagging also @thoelken and @pmjklemm from the tool survey) - [x] https://bio.tools/gunc (input, output metadata could be improved) - [x] https://bio.tools/checkm...

maybe we could simply create a "microbiome" domain on `bio.tools` following the documentation: https://biotools.readthedocs.io/en/latest/biotools_domains.html to start gathering tools. Would be more inclusive than a "nfdi4microbiota"? vote for your preference: -...

Domain is created and the tools can be added there

the collection NFDI4Microbiota now exists (https://bio.tools/t?collectionID=%22NFDI4Microbiota%22) but the tools that are part of the domain are not automatically part of the collection. Authors /editors of the tool description need to...