Viktor Kronvall

This is the contents of purs.json ```json { "name": "jelly", "version": "0.10.0", "license": "MIT", "location": { "githubOwner": "yukikurage", "githubRepo": "purescript-jelly" }, "dependencies": { "aff": ">=7.1.0 =7.1.0 =4.0.0 =6.1.0 =7.0.0 =0.4.0...

I believe that either 1. `jelly` and all packages that depend on `jelly` should be removed from the package set. 2. `jelly` should be downgraded to a version that doesn't...

Meta question: Is this the correct repo for reporting these kind of issues?

@f-f Thank you. @yukikurage Thank you for the information. The `jelly-signal-0.3.1` package from 14.2.0 doesn't seem to include the Jelly.Hooks module but 0.4.0 from 15.0.0 includes it. I have now...

Sorry for not getting back to you in what now amounts to over three months. The way to override the compiler used by purifix is to do: ```nix let purifix...

I’m not sure to what extent this should be enforced. The issue with tests is that some tests may be flaky or depend on having an Internet connection. There’s also...

@thomashoneyman Your point completely escaped me. It would indeed be nice if the test directories were included so that it’s possible to test the package sets even though spago won’t...

Apart from including the test sources in the registry storage backend the registry would also need to support declaring test dependencies. The [purs.json](https://github.com/purescript/registry-dev/blob/82f444e742e1f8bf20a3bc47616bc238f43dc4ce/types/v1/Manifest.dhall#L11) file format doesn't have a field for...

> Have you considered writing this project with [purenix](https://github.com/purenix-org/purenix)? Let me share my thoughts on this: There are a couple of places in `purifix` where I'm manually parsing various types...

> Maybe it makes more sense to stabilize purenix first. Especially the purenix ecosystem needs to grow. Here I am thinking mainly of porting the core libraries. That sounds like...