What is happening? I use comfyui and keep getting this error. KSampler 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'shape'
Your question
I used automatic 11111 but now starting to use comfyui and boy is it hard to fix all the millions of errors. Here is what i get for errors.
Also oddly my Controlnet Openpose is also bugging out it wont do it but it can make other controlnet works. What am i doing wrong?
Logs
No response
Other
No response
Text doc 2 has all error info
You should not use FLUX Clip for SD1.5 checkpoint.
You should not use FLUX Clip for SD1.5 checkpoint.
So flux has no openpose models yet?
You should not use FLUX Clip for SD1.5 checkpoint.
So flux has no openpose models yet?
ControlNet Union includes Pose capability as well. https://huggingface.co/InstantX/FLUX.1-dev-Controlnet-Union
You should not use FLUX Clip for SD1.5 checkpoint.
So flux has no openpose models yet?
ControlNet Union includes Pose capability as well. https://huggingface.co/InstantX/FLUX.1-dev-Controlnet-Union
isnt it combined? i just need open pose.
You should not use FLUX Clip for SD1.5 checkpoint.
So flux has no openpose models yet?
ControlNet Union includes Pose capability as well. https://huggingface.co/InstantX/FLUX.1-dev-Controlnet-Union
isnt it combined? i just need open pose.
AFAIK, There are no pose-specific controlnet models for FLUX yet that are not union models.
You should not use FLUX Clip for SD1.5 checkpoint.
So flux has no openpose models yet?
ControlNet Union includes Pose capability as well. https://huggingface.co/InstantX/FLUX.1-dev-Controlnet-Union
isnt it combined? i just need open pose.
AFAIK, There are no pose-specific controlnet models for FLUX yet that are not union models.
that is kinda weird, open pose is hands down one of the most important controlnet. oh well
You should not use FLUX Clip for SD1.5 checkpoint.
So flux has no openpose models yet?
ControlNet Union includes Pose capability as well. https://huggingface.co/InstantX/FLUX.1-dev-Controlnet-Union
isnt it combined? i just need open pose.
AFAIK, There are no pose-specific controlnet models for FLUX yet that are not union models.
that is kinda weird, open pose is hands down one of the most important controlnet. oh well
There is a diminished need for training individual models because the union model already covers many use cases. Training dedicated models individually also requires significant cost, and training a dedicated CNet model doesn't necessarily guarantee the best quality.