Updating access token pattern for connections sdk

[mcclowes]

Description

• Include a summary of the new content you're adding or the reason for the change.
• Include relevant context.
• Do not link to work items.
• Any PNG images should be compressed using Tiny PNG or equivalent.

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

• [ ] New document(s)/updating existing
• [ ] Fixes
• [ ] Styling
• [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Reviews and merging

You are responsible for getting your PR merged. Address review comments promptly and make sure to merge the PR when ready. Feel free to 'Enable automerge' - your PR will automatically merge when accepted and passing the build.

[vercel[bot]]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
codat-docs	✅ Ready (Inspect)	Visit Preview	💬 Add feedback	Nov 25, 2024 4:15pm

[github-actions[bot]]

Overall readability score: 59.28 (🟢 +0)

File	Readability
241124-bank-feeds-sdk.md	62.66 (🟢 +0)
connection-management.md	72.85 (🟢 +0)

View detailed metrics

🟢 - Shows an increase in readability 🔴 - Shows a decrease in readability

File	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
241124-bank-feeds-sdk.md	62.66	54.12	10.71	10.9	11.13	7.18
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0
connection-management.md	72.85	66.91	10.69	6	6.05	9.12
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

Averages:

	Readability	FRE	GF	ARI	CLI	DCRS
Average	59.28	49.91	10.19	11.32	11.89	7.77
	🟢 +0	🟢 +0.02	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0	🟢 +0

View metric targets

Metric	Range	Ideal score
Flesch Reading Ease	100 (very easy read) to 0 (extremely difficult read)	60
Gunning Fog	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Auto. Read. Index	6 (very easy read) to 14 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Coleman Liau Index	6 (very easy read) to 17 (extremely difficult read)	8 or less
Dale-Chall Readability	4.9 (very easy read) to 9.9 (extremely difficult read)	6.9 or less

[mcclowes]

ChatGPT's code review:

Code Review

1. Clarity: The code is well-structured and easy to follow. The use of markdown for documentation enhances readability.

2. Efficiency: The code demonstrates the setup process clearly, but there could be room for optimization in the initialization process. Consider optimizing the useEffect hook in the CodatBankFeeds component to avoid unnecessary re-renders.

3. Best Practices: The code adheres to best practices by using React functional components, hooks, and proper prop handling. However, there is a minor inconsistency in the naming convention for the CodatBankFeeds component. It should ideally be named CodatBankFeedsComponent for clarity.

4. Bugs/Security: The code doesn't have any apparent bugs or security vulnerabilities. However, for security best practices, ensure that sensitive data like access tokens are handled securely, possibly by using environment variables or secure storage mechanisms.

5. Maintainability: The code is maintainable due to its clear structure and separation of concerns. To enhance maintainability, consider adding more inline comments to explain complex logic or edge cases in the code.

Overall, the code is well-written and provides a clear guide for utilizing the Bank Feeds SDK. To improve efficiency, consider optimizing the useEffect hook and enhancing security measures for handling sensitive data. Additionally, consistent naming conventions and detailed comments can further enhance maintainability.

[github-actions[bot]]

Link check results (filtered):

[
  "[404] https://docs.codat.io/updates/auth-flow/authorize-embedded-link",
  "[404] https://docs.codat.io/404"
]