runtime
runtime copied to clipboard
failed to run posix filesystem conformance test
Description of problem
failed to run posix filesystem conformance test [1] in a container
Expected result
Result: SUCCESS
Actual result
Test Summary Report
-------------------
/pjd-fstest/tests/link/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 82 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 57-58, 64-65
/pjd-fstest/tests/mkdir/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 33-34
/pjd-fstest/tests/mkfifo/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 33-34
/pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 36 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 33-34
/pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/03.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 12 Failed: 9)
Failed tests: 1-3, 5-7, 9-11
/pjd-fstest/tests/mknod/11.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 28 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 12-13, 25-26
/pjd-fstest/tests/open/00.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 47 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 33-34
/pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/01.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 32 Failed: 10)
Failed tests: 10, 13, 17, 20, 22, 25, 27-28, 30, 32
/pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/02.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 80 Failed: 19)
Failed tests: 9, 12, 15, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, 47
50, 55, 59, 63, 67, 71, 75, 80
/pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/03.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 57 Failed: 21)
Failed tests: 9, 14, 18, 22-28, 34, 37, 42, 46, 50-56
/pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/04.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 53 Failed: 10)
Failed tests: 8, 10, 16, 18, 25, 29, 31, 38, 41, 43
/pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/05.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 21 Failed: 2)
Failed tests: 9, 12
/pjd-fstest/tests/xacl/06.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 42 Failed: 4)
Failed tests: 9, 12, 20, 25
Files=210, Tests=2651, 89 wallclock secs ( 0.64 usr 0.27 sys + 6.78 cusr 10.78 csys = 18.47 CPU)
Result: FAIL
fstest
[1] - https://sourceforge.net/p/ntfs-3g/pjd-fstest/ci/master/tree/
Good report. I'll note that I just ran this with 'runc', and I see 2 failures there as well (in the xacl tests, which I'm guessing are access control - maybe there is a docker setting to enable that etc.). I'll also note, maybe we can try out this test as well: http://posixtest.sourceforge.net/ which is available as a package (in ubuntu at least) already - it may be old, but it may be worth a spin.
I'll note, we fail quite a few more than the 2 xacl failures...